SMSF Terminology Can Be Confusing

The self-managed superannuation fund industry in Australia continues to expand as more people seek to take control of the process of building their retirement income. Before anyone takes the first steps to set up their own fund, however, they should realise that there is a lot to know and understand about not only the process of running the fund, but also of some of the terminology and what it means.

Most people understand the meaning of the word “asset” but in the world of the SMSF (self-managed superannuation fund) this is preceded by the word “pooled” and conversely, the word “segregated”. It is important that fund managers become familiar with these terms and understand the difference between pooled assets and segregated assets.

Pooled Assets

Let’s start first with pooled assets, which, as the name would suggest, describes the treatment of both the income and the assets within the fund. When the income and assets are pooled together, they are proportionally allocated between member pension accounts and accumulation accounts. The pension accounts receive favourable treatment under our taxation rules. The portion of the pooled assets allocated to the pension accounts can be claimed as exempt from the 15% fund income tax.

To claim this exemption however, the SMSF must obtain a Tax Certificate from an actuary stating the actual percentage of the fund’s assessable income being claimed. This percentage is then applied to the assessable income with a couple of exclusions. However, if one of the fund members retires and commences a pension part way through the year, the percentage that could be applied becomes more difficult to calculate. If during that time, for example, a fund asset with a large unrealised gain is sold, a lesser percentage of the capital gain is exempt from the 15% fund income tax than if the assets had been segregated.

Segregated Assets

When the fund segregates their holdings, they have assets that have been specifically allocated, or segregated, to fund pensions. By using this method, a certificate from an actuary is not required, but they do need to track the income from those assets. This is important when it comes time to claim that income as exempt from the 15% fund income tax. Also, the value of the assets that have been segregated to fund pensions cannot exceed the total value of those pensions.

From an administration perspective, the pooled asset method is easier for a fund trustee to manage, but it may not be in the best interests of the fund members, given the changes proposed by the federal government. The segregated method requires much more administration but it offers the opportunity to take better advantage of the existing tax exemptions.

Specialist SMSF Administrators Available to Assist

Accountants and specialist SMSF administrators such as SMSF Assure should be meeting with their SMSF trustees to discuss these two methods so that the trustees understand the differences and can make fully informed decisions about which method best suits their fund. With other changes likely to take place, it is important for trustees who have specialist SMSF administrators to keep in regular contact and discuss any issues with them before making major decisions.