If you are an SMSF trustee, you should already know that one of your responsibilities is to manage the fund’s investments in the best interests of the fund members, and in accordance with the law. To do this, you must have an investment strategy that sets out in writing the investment objectives and specifies the types of investments your fund can make.
Is Your Investment Strategy Document up to Date?
This investment strategy is not a static document but should be dynamic in nature, responding to the market and reviewed regularly to ensure that it still reflects the circumstances of its members. Matching your SMSF investments to the objectives outlined in the investment strategy can be challenging, especially in a market that is volatile or stagnant. The former moves rapidly and can catch out fund trustees who don’t move fast enough, while the latter allows otherwise valuable investments to languish, resulting in poor returns.
Issues That Will Have a Long-Term Impact
Trustees reviewing their fund’s investment strategy should be looking at a range of issues so that each member’s risk profile is considered. Among these issues are the length of time each member will take to reach retirement, the amount each member will require in retirement, and whether they have personal savings outside of the SMSF that they can access for living expenses. There are several others.
Could Asset Allocation be the Answer?
One of the ways in which a trustee can match SMSF investments to their objectives is by diversifying the investment portfolio across a range of asset classes to minimise its exposure to any market fall in a particular area. This is called asset allocation. It is achieved by identifying those assets that match the objectives of the SMSF members, and allocating a percentage of the portfolio to each of these asset classes.
There are four major asset classes; cash, shares, fixed interest and listed properties. Of course, there are both risks and benefits associated with each asset class, and an SMSF trustee responsible for deciding the allocation percentages and arranging the transactions can find the pressure is not conducive to making good decisions. As a result, they may become too conservative and risk not meeting the fund objectives.
Other Alternatives Available
A better alternative could be managed investments. These allow for a stronger level of diversification and they are handled by professional investment managers. They make all the difficult decisions that SMSF trustees find a struggle, but with the benefit of extensive market knowledge.
SMSF trustees are finding that running their own fund is proving to be more difficult than they first thought, and are increasingly turning to professional organisations such as SMSF Assure to help with the fund administration, and other licensed professionals for investment advice.
Getting the right financial advice to support your fund’s investment strategy is vital to the performance of the fund, and, in the long term, to the lifestyle aspirations of its members. Don’t be afraid to seek assistance if you are finding it difficult to match your fund’s investment performance to its overall objectives.